"Getting Back to Even"
Crammer is implying that he as a way to get back the money almost everyone lost in 2008.
This is just dishonest. Crammer is playing on peoples emotional response whenever they lose a lot of money, i.e. If I could just get back to even then I would not feel so badly...
My point:
Lets say you have two investors, one lost a load of money and the other made a lot of money in 2008.
So Crammer's book would only help the investor who lost money and then some how Crammers special investing advise would not work for the invester who made money.
What does this mean: some how the "market" knoww who made money in 2008, so Crammer's advise on getting even would work for an investor who didn't lose money in 2008?
Crammer's books and show should just be used as entertainment for the silly masses.
Wise up man in the street ...nobody who has an MBA in Finance from a top school or is a succesful money manager takes Crammer seriously.
Check out Crammer's interview confrontation with SYLVAIN RAYNES on CNBC, discussing Goldman Sachs fruad allocations, April 16 2010 on youtube...very funny!
Get more detail about Jim Cramer's Getting Back to Even.
No comments:
Post a Comment